Boxing

Their rating are written post Barrea-Pacquiao and they still put Barrera at
#7 and Pacquiao at #9. Un-hostinghostinghostinghostinging-believable.

Their rating are written post Barrea-Pacquiao and they still put Barrera at
#7 and Pacquiao at #9. Un-hostinghostinghostinghostinging-believable.>>>

Maybe Pac-Man needs to topple some of the fighters that Barrera did...?

RB

> Maybe Pac-Man needs to topple some of the fighters that Barrera did...?

For what??? Its not a stretch to say that the fight wasnt even compehostinghostinghostingive.

Actually, you can tell by reading the comments for Pacquiao and Barrera that
this list was made *before" the fight. PacMan should move ahead of Barrera
on the new list.

"The Sanity Cruzer" <> wrote in message
news:i_5ub.3722$ ink.net...
> Their rating are written post Barrea-Pacquiao and they still put Barrera
at
> #7 and Pacquiao at #9. Un-hostinghostinghostinghostinging-believable.
>
>

"cb" <> wrote in message
news:2R6ub.9106$
> Actually, you can tell by reading the comments for Pacquiao and Barrera
that
> this list was made *before" the fight. PacMan should move ahead of Barrera
> on the new list.

Actually, you should read the article more carefully before contradicting
someone. The article, under Pacquiao's ranking says, "Pacquiao fought a
great fight vs. a great fighter on Nov. 15 and deserves full credit for his
upset win."

Now, while the article might originally have been written prior to their
bout, it was not published until today, as shown by the Nov. 17 date next to
the article.
>
> "The Sanity Cruzer" <> wrote in message
> news:i_5ub.3722$ ink.net...
> > Their rating are written post Barrea-Pacquiao and they still put Barrera
> at
> > #7 and Pacquiao at #9. Un-hostinghostinghostinghostinging-believable.
> >
> >
>
>

"cb" <> wrote in message
news:2R6ub.9106$
> Actually, you can tell by reading the comments for Pacquiao and Barrera
that
> this list was made *before" the fight. PacMan should move ahead of Barrera
> on the new list.

Jeez, even the Barrera listing indicates he got his hostinghostinghosting kicked by Pacquiao,
which makes me wonder if you went to the correct web site. Or was it just a
brain fart?

Cruzer is correct as it was done afterward.
Otherwise, they'd be morons to have Manny that high without this win.

first of all, how do you leave Morales out? secondly Casamayor should be
there, and Toney should be higher perhaps, J.M. Marquez is so overated I
feel, and I would love to see him against Pacquiao, Freitas doesnt belong
near the top 10 or maybe even 20 for that matter, his management keeps him
away from any real threats, and the limited Barrios gave him so much
trouble, Rafael Marquez didnt look that good against Pastrana, who by the
way is still a good fighter, but his wins over Johnson and Austin were
monumental perhaps he should be top 10.

Barrera simply has more accomplishments and experience in the ring. Sure he
lost to Pacquiao, but it doesn't automatically mean we throw away what Barrera
has done in the past. Pacquiao has yet to establish himself and he isn't there
yet.

Where's Vernon Forest in the P4P list? Didn't he beat #5, Shane Mosley twice?

How quick everyone jumps on and off the bandwagons...

If I want to hear idiotic banter, I'll listen to Max Kellerman.


In article <i_5ub.3722$ net>,
OSPAM says...
>
>Their rating are written post Barrea-Pacquiao and they still put Barrera at
>#7 and Pacquiao at #9. Un-hostinghostinghostinghostinging-believable.
>
>

Me wrote:

> Barrera simply has more accomplishments and experience in the ring. Sure he
> lost to Pacquiao, but it doesn't automatically mean we throw away what Barrera
> has done in the past. Pacquiao has yet to establish himself and he isn't there
> yet.

He's established himself as superior to MAB.

> Where's Vernon Forest in the P4P list? Didn't he beat #5, Shane Mosley twice?


Since then, Forrest has lost twice, and Mosley has regained a world
hostinghostinghostingle at a higher weight clhostinghostinghosting by beating a better fighter (than
Forrest) in ODLH. What's the controversy? P4P ratings aren't
career-achievement awards. They're ratings of the best fighters in the
world at the time of the ratings.


Pie