|
|||||
|
|
#11 |
|
|
> Ted Harvard wrote: >> I cannot afford a modern PC, so I'm looking for C++ on tape for the >> ZX81.Where can I find it? > > Does anyone else think this was a red herring? Yes, but it's a fun-to-discuss one ![]() - Pete |
|
|
#12 |
|
|
> "Pete C." <x@x.x> wrote... >> Julie wrote: >>> Ted Harvard wrote: >>>> >>>> I cannot afford a modern PC, so I'm looking for C++ on tape for the >>>> ZX81.Where can I find it? >>> >>> If you can't afford a 'modern' pc, then you shouldn't be >>> programming. >>> >>> Programming *requires* a high level of commitment which includes the >>> necessary $$ to be able to purchase the necessary tools. >>> >>> Either make the necessary commitments, or choose something else to >>> do w/ your time. >> >> Why not? People used to get along fine with computers that had less >> power than a modern $10 pocket calculator. > > Not using Standard C++ language. The post I was responding to (Julie's) was talking about programming in general. <snip> > Common mistake (IMNSHO) made often in Usenet discussions is giving > excessively generic statements in a conversation that starts about > something pretty concrete and limited in scope. <snip> Good point ![]() - Pete |
|
|
#13 |
|
|
> Something that calls itself Ted Harvard wrote: > >> I cannot afford a modern PC, so I'm looking for C++ on tape for the >> ZX81.Where can I find it? > > This is an obvious troll. > Please ignore it. > > Notice that it was originally cross posted to alt.mythe. Please explain, what makes everyone but you incapable of deciding what posts we're allowed to respond to? - Pete |