Golf

On 15 Aug 2003 07:19:57 -0000, er
(Awake) wrote:

>Israel continued to defy international law without any significant
>criticism from their financial womb, America.

<AntiSemitic rantings snipped>

Yes, another Good Little Democrat, expressing the true feelings of the
Party.
--
"Iraq was a brilliant campaign fought with minimal
casualties, 11 September was a humiliating failure
by government to fulfill its primary role of
national defence. But Democrats who complained that
Bush was too slow to act on doubtful intelligence
re 9/11 now profess to be horrified that he was too
quick to act on doubtful intelligence re Iraq. This
is not a serious party."

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:47:24 GMT, "news.bellatlantic.net"
<> wrote:

>is there a name for people who defend israel at all costs, regardless of the
>reality of the situation, blind to the truth. why is it antisemitic to
>disagree with our gov't policy regarding israel. why is it antisemitic to
>disagree with israel and it's policies? israel's nihilistic stand in the
>middle east will be the death of us all.

Well, let's see...israel is a *tiny* country surrounded by 30,000,000
Moslems sworn to drive them into the sea. The joke is, "from a tall
building in Tel Aviv you can see 3 borders of Israel. Two face hordes
of religious fanatics sworn to drive them into the sea and the 3rd is
a beach." In the grand scheme of things Israel is about as much of a
threat to the Arabic world as native dancers in Fiji; ie., "Not At
All". Do you think there is the slightest possibility that one day the
Israeli flag will fly from the dome of Mecca? The only manner in
which THEY are a problem in the Middle East is that they exist.
Israel gets 99.9% of the invective, the comparisons to hostinghostinghostinghosting Germany,
the hatred, fear, loathing, etc. It's a fair guess that anyone
attacking Israel would like to see dead Jews floating face down in the
Mediterranean Sea.

You're Jew-haters, admit it. You'd hostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghosting for joy if the Jews
were all killed.
--
"Iraq was a brilliant campaign fought with minimal
casualties, 11 September was a humiliating failure
by government to fulfill its primary role of
national defence. But Democrats who complained that
Bush was too slow to act on doubtful intelligence
re 9/11 now profess to be horrified that he was too
quick to act on doubtful intelligence re Iraq. This
is not a serious party."

"OrionCA" <> wrote in message
news:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:47:24 GMT, "news.bellatlantic.net"
> <> wrote:
>
> >is there a name for people who defend israel at all costs, regardless of
the
> >reality of the situation, blind to the truth. why is it antisemitic to
> >disagree with our gov't policy regarding israel. why is it antisemitic
to
> >disagree with israel and it's policies? israel's nihilistic stand in the
> >middle east will be the death of us all.
>
> Well, let's see...israel is a *tiny* country surrounded by 30,000,000
> Moslems sworn to drive them into the sea. The joke is, "from a tall
> building in Tel Aviv you can see 3 borders of Israel. Two face hordes
> of religious fanatics sworn to drive them into the sea and the 3rd is
> a beach." In the grand scheme of things Israel is about as much of a
> threat to the Arabic world as native dancers in Fiji; ie., "Not At
> All". Do you think there is the slightest possibility that one day the
> Israeli flag will fly from the dome of Mecca? The only manner in
> which THEY are a problem in the Middle East is that they exist.
> Israel gets 99.9% of the invective, the comparisons to hostinghostinghostinghosting Germany,
> the hatred, fear, loathing, etc. It's a fair guess that anyone
> attacking Israel would like to see dead Jews floating face down in the
> Mediterranean Sea.
>
> You're Jew-haters, admit it. You'd hostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghostinghosting for joy if the Jews
> were all killed.
> --
> "Iraq was a brilliant campaign fought with minimal
> casualties, 11 September was a humiliating failure
> by government to fulfill its primary role of
> national defence. But Democrats who complained that
> Bush was too slow to act on doubtful intelligence
> re 9/11 now profess to be horrified that he was too
> quick to act on doubtful intelligence re Iraq. This
> is not a serious party."

you're not only sick, you're stupid
>
>

-07-19&id=3319

In alt.gossip.celebrities parismom <> wrote:
> i see that you didn't view the file in my post.

Didn't check it out.

> i guess it's tough to get power point to work on a commodore 64.

No need to be rude.


--
.................................................. ............................

Just think of the tragedy of teaching children not to doubt.

.................................................. ............................

wrote:
>
> In alt.gossip.celebrities parismom <> wrote:
> > i see that you didn't view the file in my post.
>
> Didn't check it out.
>
> > i guess it's tough to get power point to work on a commodore 64.
>
> No need to be rude.
>
> --
LOL!