Various Topics on Internet News

..

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:30:24 -0400, Just Judy
<gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:17:25 GMT, Al Superczynski
><modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:43:47 -0400, Just Judy
>><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm convinced that he doesn't want Kerry to win.
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why do you believe that?
>>
>> So that his wife won't have any viable Democrat opposition to a
>>run for President in 2008. If she could win the office then they'd be
>>President again....
>
> That's an interesting thought. Scary, but interesting.
>
> How many here think Hillary will run for president in 2008? (I
>don't).

If you had asked, "How many here think Hillary wants to run for
president in 2008?", I'd say, "I do!"

--
cg

.... ....

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:40:02 GMT, cg
<cgrams007@{take-this-out}yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:30:24 -0400, Just Judy
><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:17:25 GMT, Al Superczynski
>><modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:43:47 -0400, Just Judy
>>><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm convinced that he doesn't want Kerry to win.
>>>>
>>>> Out of curiosity, why do you believe that?
>>>
>>> So that his wife won't have any viable Democrat opposition to a
>>>run for President in 2008. If she could win the office then they'd be
>>>President again....
>>
>> That's an interesting thought. Scary, but interesting.
>>
>> How many here think Hillary will run for president in 2008? (I
>>don't).
>
>If you had asked, "How many here think Hillary wants to run for
>president in 2008?", I'd say, "I do!"

Yeah, cg, but I didn't ask that. <g>

Do you think she will run?

..

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:01:45 -0400, Just Judy
<gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:40:02 GMT, cg
><cgrams007@{take-this-out}yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:30:24 -0400, Just Judy
>><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:17:25 GMT, Al Superczynski
>>><modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:43:47 -0400, Just Judy
>>>><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm convinced that he doesn't want Kerry to win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Out of curiosity, why do you believe that?
>>>>
>>>> So that his wife won't have any viable Democrat opposition to a
>>>>run for President in 2008. If she could win the office then they'd be
>>>>President again....
>>>
>>> That's an interesting thought. Scary, but interesting.
>>>
>>> How many here think Hillary will run for president in 2008? (I
>>>don't).
>>
>>If you had asked, "How many here think Hillary wants to run for
>>president in 2008?", I'd say, "I do!"
>
> Yeah, cg, but I didn't ask that. <g>
>
> Do you think she will run?

I've not the slightest idea. There are way to many variables for me
to predict what she will do in regards to running for any office.

--
cg

.... ..

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:30:24 -0400, Just Judy
<gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:17:25 GMT, Al Superczynski
><modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:43:47 -0400, Just Judy
>><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm convinced that he doesn't want Kerry to win.
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, why do you believe that?
>>
>> So that his wife won't have any viable Democrat opposition to a
>>run for President in 2008. If she could win the office then they'd be
>>President again....
>
> That's an interesting thought. Scary, but interesting.
>
> How many here think Hillary will run for president in 2008? (I
>don't).

I think she will.

Like CG, I must admit that the things that can happen in the next
few years will might change things a lot, but I believe I am thinking
along the lines Al is; she, and he, are politicians.

2004 was a bad choice because running against a fairly popular
in***bent is dicey, at best. 2008 is probably her best chance.

--

Cheers!

.... ....

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:10:26 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
wrote:

[Hillary for President]

> 2008 is probably her best chance.

If she wins, I'm moving across the pond with Barbra and
what's-his-name: Mrs. Barbara?

.... ..

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:08:49 -0400, Just Judy
<gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:10:26 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
>wrote:
>
>[Hillary for President]

Well, for me it depends entirely upon who she might be running
against.<g>

I suppose we could do worse. In fact, I believe we have done worse.
Warren G. Harding comes to mind.<g>

She is a capable politician, or so it seems.
>
>> 2008 is probably her best chance.
>
> If she wins, I'm moving across the pond with Barbra and
>what's-his-name: Mrs. Barbara?

You would move for that? Not me. Heck, I stayed even when Bush,
jr. was elected...<G>

--

Cheers!

..y

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:32:05 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:08:49 -0400, Just Judy
><gopanth@invalid-addy.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:10:26 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>[Hillary for President]
>
> Well, for me it depends entirely upon who she might be running
>against.<g>
>
> I suppose we could do worse. In fact, I believe we have done worse.
>Warren G. Harding comes to mind.<g>
>
> She is a capable politician, or so it seems.
>>
>>> 2008 is probably her best chance.
>>
>> If she wins, I'm moving across the pond with Barbra and
>>what's-his-name: Mrs. Barbara?
>
> You would move for that? Not me. Heck, I stayed even when Bush,
>jr. was elected...<G>

Good one. <grin>
--

Ray
Mind over matter, if you don’t mind, it don’t matter.
(Confucius)

.. ..perczyns..

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:32:05 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
wrote:

>>[Hillary for President]
>
> Well, for me it depends entirely upon who she might be running
>against.<g>

Yeah, I suppose the Republicans could nominate someone worse but
I just don't see it happening.

> I suppose we could do worse. In fact, I believe we have done worse.
>Warren G. Harding comes to mind.<g>

Oh, we've done *lots* worse, that's for sure. Harding is an
excellent example. I would point to Carter as well....

> She is a capable politician, or so it seems.

That she is, and her husband is *the* consumate politician.

>> If she wins, I'm moving across the pond with Barbra and
>>what's-his-name: Mrs. Barbara?
>
> You would move for that? Not me. Heck, I stayed even when Bush,
>jr. was elected...<G>

And I stayed while Mr. Clinton was in office....... ;-p

.... ....

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:32:05 GMT, Dave K. <djkrieps@junkbust.att.net>
wrote:

>> If she wins, I'm moving across the pond with Barbra and
>>what's-his-name: Mrs. Barbara?
>
> You would move for that?

Yep, just like Barbra said she'd do.

> Not me. Heck, I stayed even when Bush,
>jr. was elected...<G>

Go to your room!

.... ....

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 03:33:01 GMT, Al Superczynski
<modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:

>Oh, we've done *lots* worse, that's for sure. Harding is an
>excellent example. I would point to Carter as well....

Ahhh, Carter. He's a mixed bag for sure. I think he was
probably the most ineffective president ever, but the one with the most
honest intentions.

My opinion of him has dropped off the scale in recent years.
However, he remains what I consider the only honest politician in
history. Honest, but ineffective.