|
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
|
problems with being left off the speakers list at this Friday's state funeral for President Reagan. What a cl*** act. <http://www.drudgereport.com/rr1.htm> -- cg |
|
|
#2 |
|
|
<cgrams007@{take-this-out}yahoo.com> wrote: >Matt Drudge is reporting that former President Clinton is having some >problems with being left off the speakers list at this Friday's state >funeral for President Reagan. Maybe he wouldn't agree to a limit of five minutes.... >What a cl*** act. Clinton wouldn't know cl*** if it bit him in the.................***. |
|
|
#3 |
|
|
> Clinton wouldn't know cl*** if it bit him in > the.................***. Now that's a ...cl*** ...statement... <eyes rolling> |
|
|
#4 |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 06:03:18 GMT the great cry-baby, Al
Superczynski gave a whiny-***ed opinion on, "Re: Poor baby", >>What a cl*** act. > > Clinton wouldn't know cl*** if it bit him in >the.................***. Clinton would beable to say things eloquently if give the chance. Bush on the other hand, will probley sound like a fool, and get toung tide. _______ _______________ ________ ___________ __ __ \___ /______ / __ ___/______ ____ /__ /_ _ / / /__ / _ __ / _____ \ _ __ `/__ / _ __/ / /_/ / _ / / /_/ / ____/ / / /_/ / _ / / /_ \____/ /_/ \__,_/ /____/ \__,_/ /_/ \__/ I'd rather be right, than Politically Correct |
|
|
#5 |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 02:08:16 -0700, Old Salt card carrying Curmudgeon
<oldsalt@spambusters.com> wrote: > Clinton would beable to say things eloquently if give the >chance. Bush on the other hand, will probley sound like a fool, >and get toung tide. It that was the only criteria for being able to speak at President Reagan's state funeral you'd be correct. Last time I checked, it was up to the family of the person who died. Who I'm sure, using your criteria, would insist on President Reagan being on the speakers list. -- cg |
|
|
#6 |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:54:33 GMT the great cry-baby, cg gave a
whiny-***ed opinion on, "Re: Poor baby", >Last time I checked, it was >up to the family of the person who died. I believe you are correct, but that was not the point I was making. _______ _______________ ________ ___________ __ __ \___ /______ / __ ___/______ ____ /__ /_ _ / / /__ / _ __ / _____ \ _ __ `/__ / _ __/ / /_/ / _ / / /_/ / ____/ / / /_/ / _ / / /_ \____/ /_/ \__,_/ /____/ \__,_/ /_/ \__/ I'd rather be right, than Politically Correct |
|
|
#7 |
|
|
Old Salt,
I would think that you, if nobody else, would realize that the measure of someone is the quality of their ideas, now how polished the presentation of those ideas. You'd surely agree that those who criticise your spelling instead of your points are not being fair or wise, wouldn't you? Why wouldn't you grant others the same for their public speaking? Jerry "Old Salt card carrying Curmudgeon" wrote ... | | Clinton would beable to say things eloquently if give the | chance. Bush on the other hand, will probley sound like a fool, | and get toung tide. |
|
|
#8 |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:06:16 GMT, "Jerry" <g.h.johnson@comcast.net>
wrote: >You'd surely agree >that those who criticise your spelling instead of your points >are not being fair or wise, wouldn't you? Why wouldn't >you grant others the same for their public speaking? That would require OS to be even-handed, a concept apparently foreign to him. |
|
|
#9 |
|
|
In an effort to amuse and confuse me, Jerry blurted out :
> "Old Salt card carrying Curmudgeon" wrote ... >> >> Clinton would beable to say things eloquently if give the >> chance. Bush on the other hand, will probley sound like a fool, >> and get toung tide.> Old Salt, > > I would think that you, if nobody else, would realize that the > measure of someone is the quality of their ideas, now how > polished the presentation of those ideas. You'd surely agree > that those who criticise your spelling instead of your points > are not being fair or wise, wouldn't you? Why wouldn't > you grant others the same for their public speaking? > > Jerry > > Denial is a vicious thing. -- © ~~Iggy~~ (©)(©) ------ooo--(__)--ooo------ ~~Drop 'The Attitude' before e-mailing~~ www.cyberhelpdesk.net |
|
|
#10 |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 05:52:04 -0700, Old Salt card carrying Curmudgeon
<oldsalt@spambusters.com> wrote: >On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:54:33 GMT the great cry-baby, cg gave a >whiny-***ed opinion on, "Re: Poor baby", > >>Last time I checked, it was >>up to the family of the person who died. > > I believe you are correct, but that was not the point I >was making. And your point had zip to do with the point I was making. So, what is your point? <sorry - I couldn't resist> -- cg |