Various Topics on Internet News

.. ..perczyns..

It's too bad he couldn't get the Democrats' nomination. I might
have been able to support him - he might have been a viable
choice.....

http://tinyurl.com/39lv7

..

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:12:21 GMT, Al Superczynski
<modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:

>
> It's too bad he couldn't get the Democrats' nomination. I might
>have been able to support him - he might have been a viable
>choice.....
>
> http://tinyurl.com/39lv7

Yes he does get it and I also would have considered him. I still have
a little problem with his backing off his stance on racial quotas when
he ran as the VP candidate but that is nothing compared to the values
he espouses in this article. I would hope this is a stance he will
not back away from.

--
cg

..thr.. ..mps..

Didn't I say that months or at least weeks ago? <g>


--
Regards of the NW,
Kathy

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously". Hubert Humphrey



"Al Superczynski" <modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote in message
news:tsh9d01vm1jp5n4pjocaf3bbf8j9jte0dt@4ax.com...
>
> It's too bad he couldn't get the Democrats' nomination. I might
> have been able to support him - he might have been a viable
> choice.....
>
> http://tinyurl.com/39lv7

.. ..perczyns..

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:03:56 GMT, "Kathryn Simpson"
<kjsimpson@REMOVETHISatt.net> wrote:

>Didn't I say that months or at least weeks ago? <g>

Yep. I think I agreed then, too...... ;-p

..m ..dri..

Al Superczynski wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:03:56 GMT, "Kathryn Simpson"
> <kjsimpson@REMOVETHISatt.net> wrote:
>
> >Didn't I say that months or at least weeks ago? <g>
>
> Yep. I think I agreed then, too...... ;-p

Then I see no need for you two to be discussing it again. "I don't know
the smiley I'm suppose to use for expression of comtempt for this type
of dribble"

..

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:32:09 -0500, Tom Aldrich
<TomAlrich@newshosting.com> wrote:

>
>
>Al Superczynski wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:03:56 GMT, "Kathryn Simpson"
>> <kjsimpson@REMOVETHISatt.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Didn't I say that months or at least weeks ago? <g>
>>
>> Yep. I think I agreed then, too...... ;-p
>
>Then I see no need for you two to be discussing it again. "I don't know
>the smiley I'm suppose to use for expression of comtempt for this type
>of dribble"
>

What is making you so grumpy?

--
cg

.. ..perczyns..

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:32:09 -0500, Tom Aldrich
<TomAlrich@newshosting.com> wrote:

>...I see no need for you two to be discussing it again.

Since when did you join the Usenet Police?

>"I don't know the smiley I'm suppose to use for expression of comtempt for this type
>of dribble"

I think you meant to type 'contempt' and 'drivel'....