Various Topics on Internet News

..y

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:14:06 GMT, "Nick C" <n-chen@cometcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Ray" <rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote in message
>news:jgp1d65uan22iifq9sdpu4ho174gdq2857@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:54:30 GMT, "Nick C" <n-chen@cometcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Ray" <rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote in message
>> >news:ei6aqvsa5dmkih9k0i7qnf93cpulhq8u5v@4ax.com.. .
>> >
>> >> Who Am I ?
>> >
>> >Someone who has hit the ground running ...... in the wrong direction.
>> >
>> >Nick
>> ><g>
>> >
>> Is that why Germany didn't by into his spin? <g>
>
>C'mon Ray, you know better than that. France, Germany, and Russia had
>'deals' made with Saddam that they wanted to preserve.

I started to add the others but I think every one know by now.

>It would have been more accurate to say, I'm not buying _your_ spin. But
>what the heck, if we always agreed with each other only one of us would need
>to post.
>
>Come to think about it, what that understanding, next time you want to post
>something negative about Bushy, let me know so I can tell you what to say.
>That way we will agree with each other and only you need to do the post
>while I take a nap.

Think Satire. But there were some good points & it did get all the
republicans stirred up. <g>

>Nick
><g>
>
>

--

Ray
Mind over matter, if you don’t mind, it don’t matter.
(Confucius)

..y

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:43:35 GMT, "Hooda Gest" <Be@One_With.Calm> wrote:

>
>"Ray" <rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote in message
>news:j5p1d65862qqr573jrdj9i923hl36kmbb7@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 15:56:49 GMT, "Hooda Gest" <Be@One_With.Calm> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Ray" <rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote in message
>> >news:ei6aqvsa5dmkih9k0i7qnf93cpulhq8u5v@4ax.com.. .
>> >> Who Am I ?
>> >
>> >You are a person who blames the events initiated and executed by others
>on a
>> >scapegoat, a scapegoat you created because he has a different political
>> >philosophy than you.
>>
>> You didn't read the article did you? <grin>
>
>
>I was commenting on *you* and why you posted that.

What else is new as you all ways do. LMAO


--

Ray
Mind over matter, if you don’t mind, it don’t matter.
(Confucius)

.. ..perczyns..

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:31:30 GMT, David Krieps
<djkrieps@nojunk.att.net> wrote:

>Note there is a reference to the Condoleeza Rice tanker in
><http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/resume.asp>

And here is a refutation of the 'resume':
http://www.crossbearer.com/resume/The_Truth.pdf .
--
"I am alone: all drowns in the Pharisees' hypocrisy". - Boris Pasternak

My "From" address is munged - c**** "Reply To" to respond via email.

..thr.. ..mps..

Ok, I have to confess. Apparently the story of Chevron naming an oil tanker
after Rice was correct (but the picture wasn't). Chevron named a tanker for
her while she was still a member of their Board of Directors. In 2001,
Chevron renamed the tanker the "Altair Voyager". My research hasn't been
able to determine who made the request and who made the decision.

Btw, the tanker was named for Ms. Rice long before she was appointed
National Security Advisor (in 2001). Ms. Rice was on the Chevron Board from
1991 until her appointment as National Security Advisor. The ship was
commissioned in 1993.


--

Regards of the NW,
Kathy

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously". Hubert Humphrey







"Kathryn Simpson" <kjsimpsonREMOVETHIS@att.net> wrote in message
news:BX9pb.24759$Ec1.2229319@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> "Ray" <rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote in message
> news:ei6aqvsa5dmkih9k0i7qnf93cpulhq8u5v@4ax.com...
> > Members of my cabinet are the richest of any administration in US
> > history. (The poorest multimillionaire, Condoleeza Rice, has a
> > Chevron oil tanker named after her.)
>
> My, you are the gullible one, Ray. The picture circulating to "prove this
is
> faked.
> http://aztlan.net/oiltanker.htm
> to beat, but I did it!!).
>
>
> > I am the first president in US history to compel the United Nations
> > remove the US from the Human Rights Commission.
>
> This makes it sound like Bush wanted the U.S. removed from this
commission.
> He didn't. However, he recognized the UN's right to vote as it pleased.
>
> http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/UN-Removes-US.htm
>
> > I rendered the entire United Nations irrelevant.
>
> The United Nations would probably strongly disagree with that statement.
>
> > I am the first president to run & hide when the US came under attack,
> > then lied, saying the enemy had the code to Air Force One
>
> First, the President's security force drills and drills and drills some
more
> to protect him in the event of an attack. Did you really think the
> President should have immediately flown back to Washington D.C while the
> situation was still volatile? Second, the United States was devastated
> enough on Sept. 11th. To throw us in further disarray by having our
> President killed would have been giving Osama Bin Laden exactly what he
> wanted. Instead, the President's security force did exactly what they
were
> trained and trained and trained some more to do... protect the President
of
> the United States so that your system of government is preserved in time
of
> national crisis.
>
> It took me about 7 minutes to debunk just three of these items.
>
> They are fun for the anti-Bush to peddle around to continue to stir the
pot,
> but they have little basis in real facts or truth. Throw in 10% truth
with
> 90% fabrication and some people will believe because it resembles truth.
> Sad that so many are so gullible.
>
>
> --
>
> Regards of the NW,
> Kathy
>
> "The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be
taken
> seriously". Hubert Humphrey
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards of the NW,
> Kathy
>
> "The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be
taken
> seriously". Hubert Humphrey
>
>
>
>

..v.. ..ie..

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 04:27:38 -0600, Al Superczynski
<modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:31:30 GMT, David Krieps
><djkrieps@nojunk.att.net> wrote:
>
>>Note there is a reference to the Condoleeza Rice tanker in
>><http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/resume.asp>
>
> And here is a refutation of the 'resume':
>http://www.crossbearer.com/resume/The_Truth.pdf .

Not to worry, I never believed that was any kind of resume' anyone
would write save an idiot. I don't believe he is an idiot either.

--

Cheers!

.. ..perczyns..

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:50:50 GMT, David Krieps
<djkrieps@nojunk.att.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 04:27:38 -0600, Al Superczynski
><modeleral@deadspam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:31:30 GMT, David Krieps
>><djkrieps@nojunk.att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Note there is a reference to the Condoleeza Rice tanker in
>>><http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/resume.asp>
>>
>> And here is a refutation of the 'resume':
>>http://www.crossbearer.com/resume/The_Truth.pdf .
>
> Not to worry, I never believed that was any kind of resume' anyone
>would write save an idiot.

Sorry if you thought that was meant specifically for you. It was
just a general comment.

>I don't believe he is an idiot either.

Never thought you did. Reasoned opposition is both welcome and
necessary. It is blind hatred that I find suffocating.

--
"I am alone: all drowns in the Pharisees' hypocrisy". - Boris Pasternak

My "From" address is munged - c**** "Reply To" to respond via email.

..i.. ..sperati..

In article <ei6aqvsa5dmkih9k0i7qnf93cpulhq8u5v@4ax.com>, Ray
<rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote:

> Who Am I ?

That much is self-evident.

For oppressed member of a totalitarian police state, and poor exploited
slave of the ubercorporate reality, you sure have a lot of free time
and seem to have no fear expressing your views.

I'm not a Bush fan, but about 85% of your "points" fell into three
categories:

1. Utter bull****. For example, the economy started tanking before the
2000 election, and the initial weaknesses can be seen as early as 1998.

2. Scapegoating Bush for the actions of others.

3. Things that aren't actually bad to anyone with an ounce of sense and
even a 1/16 view of the big picture.

Some advice:

- Stop trying to reivse history we all just recently lived through. The
only one who will swallow it are other ignorant ideologues, so why
spend time preaching to the choir?

- Do what I did 20 years ago when I was 18. ***ume everything you know
to be wrong or at least only a part of the truth, and spend time
reading and learning about the world.

I end with a quote from Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson:

"Can't you recognize bull****? Don't you think it would be a useful
item to add to your intellectual toolkit to be capable of saying, when
a ton of wet steaming bull**** lands on your head, "My goodness, this
appears to be bull****"?"



-

.... ....

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:15:48 -0800, Quiet Desperation
<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

>I end with a quote from Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson:
>
>"Can't you recognize bull****? Don't you think it would be a useful
>item to add to your intellectual toolkit to be capable of saying, when
>a ton of wet steaming bull**** lands on your head, "My goodness, this
>appears to be bull****"?"

If it were shorter, it'd make a great sig file!

..i.. ..sperati..

In article <gdd200p5n79csmv9204pqc5q741tabbha6@4ax.com>, Just Judy
<gopanth@bellMIDDLE.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:15:48 -0800, Quiet Desperation
> <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >I end with a quote from Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson:
> >
> >"Can't you recognize bull****? Don't you think it would be a useful
> >item to add to your intellectual toolkit to be capable of saying, when
> >a ton of wet steaming bull**** lands on your head, "My goodness, this
> >appears to be bull****"?"
>
> If it were shorter, it'd make a great sig file!

I've seen it used as such.

..y

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:15:48 -0800, Quiet Desperation
<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

>In article <ei6aqvsa5dmkih9k0i7qnf93cpulhq8u5v@4ax.com>, Ray
><rvlc@wohooo.net> wrote:
>
>> Who Am I ?
>
>That much is self-evident.
>
>For oppressed member of a totalitarian police state, and poor exploited
>slave of the ubercorporate reality, you sure have a lot of free time
>and seem to have no fear expressing your views.
>
>I'm not a Bush fan, but about 85% of your "points" fell into three
>categories:
>
>1. Utter bull****. For example, the economy started tanking before the
>2000 election, and the initial weaknesses can be seen as early as 1998.
>
>2. Scapegoating Bush for the actions of others.
>
>3. Things that aren't actually bad to anyone with an ounce of sense and
>even a 1/16 view of the big picture.
>
>Some advice:
>
>- Stop trying to reivse history we all just recently lived through. The
>only one who will swallow it are other ignorant ideologues, so why
>spend time preaching to the choir?
>
>- Do what I did 20 years ago when I was 18. ***ume everything you know
>to be wrong or at least only a part of the truth, and spend time
>reading and learning about the world.
>
>I end with a quote from Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson:
>
>"Can't you recognize bull****? Don't you think it would be a useful
>item to add to your intellectual toolkit to be capable of saying, when
>a ton of wet steaming bull**** lands on your head, "My goodness, this
>appears to be bull****"?"

Time will set you free. But you are a good republican & believe all of
Bush BS.

--

Ray
Mind over matter, if you don’t mind, it don’t matter.
(Confucius)