Various Topics on Internet

....

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:13:05 -0000, Dave <notvalid.for@privacy.net> wrote:

Hi,



> Thats rubbish, most which have had the email are nowhere near
> "1000Gb+ in a
> couple of months" you should have a look on the adslguide.org forums to
> see
> one person that got the email claims their actual use in the last 3
> months
> was just over 80Gb

Certainly not everyone we contacted was doing 1000GB, I've asked the
person I think you are referring to to contact me so I can check it out.



> There is no proof that anybody has spoiled the service for anyone at all,
> all the users know is that plusnet dont like 0.3% (whatever thats spose


It's isn't a case that we don't like anyone, want we are trying to do is
ensure that the for the vast majority of our customers isn't spoiled and
still offer the highest quality service to all customers.


> mean) users. As for the term unlimited, i dont think they actually use
> that in their terms, however if they do then they should be selling what
> they advertise, if they are not, that is against the law.


The service hasn't been marketted as unlimited. For starters it wouldn't
be technically possible to offer an unlimited service because even maxing
out upload and download you'll hit a limit. But I'm being pedantic now.


>> offered you unlimited alcohol in a pub for 20 quid a night, would you
>> sit
>> there drinking 200 gl***es of wine just to put the pub out of buisness?
>
> Some would, and they know they would, hence the reason no pub owner with
> any brain would offer such a scheme.


They did this at a couple of clubs near me a couple of years back, but
people being people drank that bit too much, not for the clubs, but for
the police who asked them to stop this type of promotion.





With Regards,

Dave,
--
| Dave Tomlinson Broadband Solutions For
| Customer Support for Home & Business
| PlusNet plc @ http://www.plus.net
+ ----- My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet -----

..n ..

Trev blurted on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:38:46 -0000:

> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:13:05 -0000, Dave <notvalid.for@privacy.net> wrote:

Yep I read that earlier :-)

--
Many an opportunity is lost because a man is out looking for four-leaf
clovers.

....

"Ron S" <newredward@gmx.invalid> wrote in message
news:9wyrffwix7f5.dlg@ronronronronronronron.com...
> Trev blurted on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:38:46 -0000:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:13:05 -0000, Dave <notvalid.for@privacy.net>
>> wrote:
>
> Yep I read that earlier :-)
>
And we though 500Gb was imposable

..n ..

Trev blurted on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:46:11 -0000:

>> Yep I read that earlier :-)
>>
> And we though 500Gb was imposable

Yep...I've always been rubbish at maths though :-)

--
It is always the best policy to tell the truth, unless,
of course, you are an exceptionally good liar.
*Jerome K Jerome*