|
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
|
and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.) And that's all I have to say about that. ![]() |
|
|
#2 |
|
|
>and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to >take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't >think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here. After all we got dragged into it. Yes, it obviously did go too far. I personally hope a lot more thought goes into just how much hurt she caused trying to be a smart ***. Rae <who is not sure if she'd rather find out this is a known antagonist or someone thought a friend.> Rae Morrill in Maine "Ya can't get theyuh from heeah" _______________________________ Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM! |
|
|
#3 |
|
|
wrote: >Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here. >After all we got dragged into it. We did? If I considered myself "dragged into" everything posted here, I'd have to stop reading. >Yes, it obviously did go too far. I >personally hope a lot more thought goes into just how much hurt she caused >trying to be a smart ***. I was under the impression it was Marge who called Vickie, not the owner of Empty Stars. I'm still having a difficult time seeing how anything posted at the site was the cause of the problem. It seems to me that Marge's unwillingness to allow less than flattering things said online about her site, her company or her school without calling out the lawyers was the cause the problem. ~~~~~*****~~~~~*****~~~~~***** To send me e-mail, use juliew8@deletethis-alphabest.com |
|
|
#4 |
|
|
>t Marge's unwillingness to allow less than flattering things
>said online about her site, her company or her school without calling >out the lawyers was the cause the problem. Ah, typical blame the one who was just sitting there MHOB tactic. Pretty funny thing, though. A Google search on emptystars.com and then on the cache will show you a page. A quick Google search on a couple of key phrases, combined with knowing what someone's work skills are leads one towards a certain suspicion - shall we say. Rae Morrill in Maine "Ya can't get theyuh from heeah" _______________________________ Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM! |
|
|
#5 |
|
|
>Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here.
>After all we got dragged into it I still don't see why some think it is necessary to "come out" here. I also don't understand the "we got dragged into it part". Nobody got dragged into anything. Who drug you into the situation? Yes, something was said on the site regarding RM but nothing here was mentioned about you, regarding you, to you - at least as far as I saw. I could be wrong - I have not seen every single post. |
|
|
#6 |
|
|
And that's all ... six times worth <gg> Marge, give that computer some
water, it is having cyber hiccups )) We folks down here in FL are theones who are supposed to be having computer/phone/electric problems <gg> Nae Margery Hinman wrote: > No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone > and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to > take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't > think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated > in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the > way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I > can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.) > > And that's all I have to say about that. > > ![]() |
|
|
#7 |
|
|
>A quick Google search on a couple of key phrases,
>combined with knowing what someone's work skills are leads one towards a >certain suspicion - shall we say. > > >Rae Morrill in Maine Oh god, let's not say. With you, suspicions are as common as I don't know what. Gisele |
|
|
#8 |
|
|
I only see it once. Maybe you're the one with the hiccups?? Just a thought.
:-) Cindy C. "Nae" <pithy@millenicom.com> wrote in message news:41249B67.9020402@millenicom.com... > And that's all ... six times worth <gg> Marge, give that computer some > water, it is having cyber hiccups )) We folks down here in FL are the> ones who are supposed to be having computer/phone/electric problems <gg> > > Nae > > > Margery Hinman wrote: > > > No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone > > and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to > > take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't > > think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated > > in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the > > way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I > > can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.) > > > > And that's all I have to say about that. > > > > ![]() --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 08/16/2004 |
|
|
#9 |
|
|
>Oh god, let's not say. With you, suspicions are as common as I don't know
>what. HMMM. Yeah, just like with the last troll attack. Nailed it pretty much exactly. Anyone who is curious will find out for themselves. If they're not, they don't have to know. Rae Morrill in Maine "Ya can't get theyuh from heeah" _______________________________ Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM! |
|
|
#10 |
|
|
>HMMM. Yeah, just like with the last troll attack. Nailed it pretty much
>exactly. Anyone who is curious will find out for themselves. If they're not, >they don't have to know. Then why do you keep mentioning that they should "come out" here? |