> Science > Medicine - Transcription
Various Topics Home | Disclaimer | Report Adult Posts

Various Topics on Medicine - Transcription



Medicine - Transcription - "Do I still think they're ball-less?" in Science


Old 08-19-2004   #1
..rge.. ..nm..
 
Default Do I still think they're ball-less?

No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone
and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to
take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't
think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated
in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the
way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I
can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.)

And that's all I have to say about that.


 
Old 08-19-2004   #2
..eMorri..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone
>and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to
>take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't
>think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated


Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here.
After all we got dragged into it. Yes, it obviously did go too far. I
personally hope a lot more thought goes into just how much hurt she caused
trying to be a smart ***.

Rae <who is not sure if she'd rather find out this is a known antagonist or
someone thought a friend.>


Rae Morrill in Maine
"Ya can't get theyuh from heeah"
_______________________________
Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM!


 
Old 08-19-2004   #3
..lie..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

On 19 Aug 2004 04:35:51 GMT, raemorrill@aol.com.com (RaeMorrill)
wrote:

>Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here.
>After all we got dragged into it.


We did? If I considered myself "dragged into" everything posted here,
I'd have to stop reading.

>Yes, it obviously did go too far. I
>personally hope a lot more thought goes into just how much hurt she caused
>trying to be a smart ***.


I was under the impression it was Marge who called Vickie, not the
owner of Empty Stars. I'm still having a difficult time seeing how
anything posted at the site was the cause of the problem. It seems to
me that Marge's unwillingness to allow less than flattering things
said online about her site, her company or her school without calling
out the lawyers was the cause the problem.

~~~~~*****~~~~~*****~~~~~*****
To send me e-mail, use juliew8@deletethis-alphabest.com
 
Old 08-19-2004   #4
..eMorri..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>t Marge's unwillingness to allow less than flattering things
>said online about her site, her company or her school without calling
>out the lawyers was the cause the problem.


Ah, typical blame the one who was just sitting there MHOB tactic.

Pretty funny thing, though. A Google search on emptystars.com and then on the
cache will show you a page. A quick Google search on a couple of key phrases,
combined with knowing what someone's work skills are leads one towards a
certain suspicion - shall we say.


Rae Morrill in Maine
"Ya can't get theyuh from heeah"
_______________________________
Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM!


 
Old 08-19-2004   #5
..ann.. .. ..ls..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>Glad you got that resolved, but I think more balls would be to come out here.
>After all we got dragged into it


I still don't see why some think it is necessary to "come out" here. I also
don't understand the "we got dragged into it part". Nobody got dragged into
anything. Who drug you into the situation? Yes, something was said on the
site regarding RM but nothing here was mentioned about you, regarding you, to
you - at least as far as I saw. I could be wrong - I have not seen every
single post.
 
Old 08-19-2004   #6
..e
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

And that's all ... six times worth <gg> Marge, give that computer some
water, it is having cyber hiccups )) We folks down here in FL are the
ones who are supposed to be having computer/phone/electric problems <gg>

Nae


Margery Hinman wrote:

> No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone
> and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to
> take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't
> think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated
> in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the
> way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I
> can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.)
>
> And that's all I have to say about that.
>
>

 
Old 08-19-2004   #7
..ubs..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>A quick Google search on a couple of key phrases,
>combined with knowing what someone's work skills are leads one towards a
>certain suspicion - shall we say.
>
>
>Rae Morrill in Maine


Oh god, let's not say. With you, suspicions are as common as I don't know
what.

Gisele
 
Old 08-19-2004   #8
..oner..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

I only see it once. Maybe you're the one with the hiccups?? Just a thought.
:-)

Cindy C.


"Nae" <pithy@millenicom.com> wrote in message
news:41249B67.9020402@millenicom.com...
> And that's all ... six times worth <gg> Marge, give that computer some
> water, it is having cyber hiccups )) We folks down here in FL are the
> ones who are supposed to be having computer/phone/electric problems <gg>
>
> Nae
>
>
> Margery Hinman wrote:
>
> > No Rae, I don't. I think it took a lot of guts to pick up the phone
> > and call me and admit to being the owner. Also took a lot of guts to
> > take the site down and admit that a lot of it went too far. I don't
> > think that was the intention when it was put up, but it just migrated
> > in that direction. I didn't ask for the site to be taken down by the
> > way -- just for the erroneous information to be deleted. (Opinions I
> > can handle, but false statements made as facts are different.)
> >
> > And that's all I have to say about that.
> >
> >



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 08/16/2004


 
Old 08-19-2004   #9
..eMorri..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>Oh god, let's not say. With you, suspicions are as common as I don't know
>what.


HMMM. Yeah, just like with the last troll attack. Nailed it pretty much
exactly. Anyone who is curious will find out for themselves. If they're not,
they don't have to know.

Rae Morrill in Maine
"Ya can't get theyuh from heeah"
_______________________________
Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM!


 
Old 08-19-2004   #10
..ann.. .. ..ls..
 
Default Re: Do I still think they're ball-less?

>HMMM. Yeah, just like with the last troll attack. Nailed it pretty much
>exactly. Anyone who is curious will find out for themselves. If they're not,
>they don't have to know.


Then why do you keep mentioning that they should "come out" here?
 

« OT: vent | - »
Thread Tools
Display Modes





Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0