> Cars > Porsche
Various Topics Home | Disclaimer | Report Adult Posts

Various Topics on Porsche



Porsche - "Re: Dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear..." in Cars


Old 01-06-2008   #1
..
 
Default Re: Dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear...


"Bert Kanters" <ff@dd.nl> wrote in message
news:199ef$477eea3b$541c1857$13061@cache5.tilbu1.n b.home.nl...
>
> "****fall" <****fall@****fall.org> schreef in bericht
> news:K-KdnTlYEJcVV-PaRVnyugA@bt.com...
> > Strangely, its actually better loooking than a 308, I ***ume its

actually
> > quicker than one too, the 308/328 are pedestrian compaired
> > to 'supercars' of their year, a 911SC was far, far more quicker (and

built
> > to last)
> >

> Not true.
>


Yes probably the kit wasn't better looking but the Porsche 911 was far more
quicker and built to last
Hence the 'huge' rise in residual values of the cl***ic 911, Ferrari is a
myth based on people have more money than sense.
Poorly manufactured cars, cheap labour, cheap paint and tinpot materials.

Everyone whom I have met who has owned a Ferrari always has vast tales of
woe to tell, everyone whom has owned a 911 rejoices in its sheer ability to
do everything perfectly & that includes being a better drive and also far
quicker than its Ferrari counterparts.

Within 20 years, Ferrari simply won't exist, stock up on your parts now !



 
Old 01-11-2008   #2
..eld..
 
Default Re: Dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear...


"kk" <kkk@kkk.net> wrote in message news:7YqdnVTNntJzgx3aRVnyjQA@bt.com...
>
> "Bert Kanters" <ff@dd.nl> wrote in message
> news:199ef$477eea3b$541c1857$13061@cache5.tilbu1.n b.home.nl...
>>
>> "****fall" <****fall@****fall.org> schreef in bericht
>> news:K-KdnTlYEJcVV-PaRVnyugA@bt.com...
>> > Strangely, its actually better loooking than a 308, I ***ume its

> actually
>> > quicker than one too, the 308/328 are pedestrian compaired
>> > to 'supercars' of their year, a 911SC was far, far more quicker (and

> built
>> > to last)
>> >

>> Not true.
>>

>
> Yes probably the kit wasn't better looking but the Porsche 911 was far
> more
> quicker and built to last
> Hence the 'huge' rise in residual values of the cl***ic 911, Ferrari is a
> myth based on people have more money than sense.
> Poorly manufactured cars, cheap labour, cheap paint and tinpot materials.
>
> Everyone whom I have met who has owned a Ferrari always has vast tales of
> woe to tell, everyone whom has owned a 911 rejoices in its sheer ability
> to
> do everything perfectly & that includes being a better drive and also far
> quicker than its Ferrari counterparts.
>
> Within 20 years, Ferrari simply won't exist, stock up on your parts now !
>


Before I got my 911 it was a toss up between the 911 and the 308. Both had
equal specs, and, to my eyes, the Ferrari was beautiful while the Porsche
was cl***ic. I read a road test comparing the two, and while the Ferrari
got better marks for being more civil in the handling department (no
unexpected 180's), the Porsche got higher marks from the writers as a fun
car to take on a trip. Add to that the fact that there is nobody around
here who fixes Ferrari's and it wasn't a hard decision to make. That said,
the 308 I didn't buy is worth a lot more than my 911 today.


 

Thread Tools
Display Modes





Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0