|
|||||
|
|
#11 |
|
|
> Xah Lee wrote: >> of motherf***ing irrevalent drivel? > > I am greatly amused. > A troll impersonating Xah Lee has made xah look like a total moron. > LOL Sorry, Joe, but why do you think this wasn't Xah? Every detail of the post is consistent with his recent postings. And a secondary, but purely rhetorical, question: how could the post have made him look like a moron when he already looked like one? |
|
|
#12 |
|
|
> Joe Smith wrote: > > Xah Lee wrote: > >> of motherf***ing irrevalent drivel? > > > > I am greatly amused. > > A troll impersonating Xah Lee has made xah look like a total moron. > > LOL > > Sorry, Joe, but why do you think this wasn't Xah? why do you think "Joe" and "Xah" are two different persons? ;-) </F> |
|
|
#13 |
|
|
> Peter Hansen wrote: >>Joe Smith wrote: >> >>>Xah Lee wrote: >>> >>>>of motherf***ing irrevalent drivel? >>> >>>I am greatly amused. >>>A troll impersonating Xah Lee has made xah look like a total moron. >>>LOL >> >>Sorry, Joe, but why do you think this wasn't Xah? > > why do you think "Joe" and "Xah" are two different persons? ;-) Because Joe writes properly, and concisely. ;-) |
|
|
#14 |
|
|
Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
> Richie Hindle wrote: > > > > [Xah] > > > mother****ing ... ****ing ... ****ing ... ****ing ... **** ... ****ing > > > ****ing ... ****ing ... mother ****ing ... ****ing ... piece of **** ... > > > mother****ing ... ****ing ... ****ing ... big ***hole ... masturbation ... > > > ****ing morons ... ****ing stupid ... ****head coders ... ****heads ... > > > you ****ing ***es. > > > > > paypal me a hundred dollars and i'll rewrite the whole re doc in a few > > > hours. > > > > Can we paypal you a hundred dollars to leave us alone? I'll pledge $10. > > Are there another nine people here who'll do the same? > > Why don't we pay him $100 to re-write the PERL docs? Interestingly, Richard Hindle's message was cl***ified as ham by my spambayes, whereas your message was unsure. Could it be the second-to-last word doing it? (-; Gerrit. -- Weather in Twenthe, Netherlands 12/04 19:55: 13.0°C wind 2.2 m/s NNW (57 m above NAP) -- In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. -Dwight David Eisenhower, January 17, 1961 |
|
|
#15 |
|
|
> why cannot this piece of **** writing give a single example of usage?
Actually, I can understand your frustration even if you should enhance your vocabulary slightly. I often struggle with the Python do***netation myself and I can't understand why a couple of examples are so hard to give. When I laernt PHP I used the resources at php.net exclusively, and that's because of the plenty of examples and the newbie friendlyness. Recently I struggled with the regex module and found the the do***entation being close to worthless. I'm not a CS guy, I may have a harder fight grasping concepts. The re do***entation, like much Python do***entation seems to be written with other people than my kind in mind. Luckily I found this regex howto: http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/regex/ and that helped a lot. In addition, Mr. Magnus Lie Hetland coincidentally posted a question on this list that got answers that helped me out. (http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...4c56ca66231d7f) |
|
|
#16 |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:06:36 +0200, Roman Neuhauser
<neuhauser+python-list#python.org@sigpipe.cz> wrote: > > Unfortunately, the python community seems to bathe in the > misorganized half-do***entation, see e. g. > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pyth...3919606261&w=2 > especially the reply that (as I read it) suggested reverse > engineering as a viable alternative to do***entation. As I read the reply, it was a smart-arse attempt at humour, a *PUN* on the word "list" (mailing list versus Python list). What I would call "introspection" (not "reverse engineering") was then suggested. Moreover, both of the concepts mentioned in the quoted thread (sequence.index() and the "in" operator) are IMESHO adequately do***ented. Do you have any examples of what you regard as "misorganized half-do***entation"? Here's a puzzle for you: Where does this list appear? What's missing? "..., Mullender, Nagata, Ng, Oner, Oppelstrup, ..." |
|
|
#17 |
|
|
On 12 Apr 2005 15:06:30 -0700, "runes" <rune.strand@gmail.com> wrote:
>Luckily I found this regex howto: >http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/regex/ and that helped a lot. Luckily??? AMK's howto is pointed to by the 3rd paragraph of Section 4.2.1 of the do***entation that you are dissing: """ A brief explanation of the format of regular expressions follows. For further information and a gentler presentation, consult the Regular Expression HOWTO, accessible from http://www.python.org/doc/howto/. """ >In >addition, Mr. Magnus Lie Hetland coincidentally posted a question on >this list that got answers that helped me out. >(http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...4c56ca66231d7f) The answers (paraphrased) were "read the [Xah-Lee-word]ing manual". I'm glad that you RTFMed, and that it helped you. You should do so more often. |
|
|
#18 |
|
|
Thank you for being so friendly!
I found the Howto through Google. Somehow I didn't see that link in the do***entation. And please do not make any ***umptions about my reading of manuals. |
|
|
#19 |
|
|
In comp.lang.perl.misc Xah Lee <xah@xahlee.org> wrote:
> The answer to the questions are resounding yeses, you ****ing ***es. > paypal me a hundred dollars and i'll rewrite the whole re doc in a few > hours. > **** you the standard IT morons. Excuse me for i didn't have time to > write a more coherent and detailed analysis of the stupidities of the > re doc. Don't worry! Very soon, some nice men in white coats will show you a comfortable room with soft walls in which you can write such do***entation to your hearts content. Axel |
|
|
#20 |
|
|
I sympathize with you and also think there should be an "add comment" in the Python do***entation website, so that users could post their code snippets in the relevant places. > I found the Howto through Google. Somehow I didn't see that link in the > do***entation. > > And please do not make any ***umptions about my reading of manuals. > |