|
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
|
new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600' hill each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake life is usually quite good at the start. -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/> |
|
|
#2 |
|
|
> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without > getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and > finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a > foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600' hill > each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake life is > usually quite good at the start. > Hi, With manual shift equipped car, brake can last longer. |
|
|
#3 |
|
|
> W. eWatson wrote: >> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without >> getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and >> finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a >> foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600' >> hill each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake >> life is usually quite good at the start. >> > Hi, > With manual shift equipped car, brake can last longer. I have an automatic. It's good to see there's someone here besides myself. When I rejoined today, I saw only one other post. Months ago there were hundreds. -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/> |
|
|
#4 |
|
|
If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my
suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then that may be the problem. |
|
|
#5 |
|
|
johninky wrote:
> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my > suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then > that may be the problem. The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third party. -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/> |
|
|
#6 |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote
(in article <VITqk.18393$xZ.2230@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>): > johninky wrote: >> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my >> suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then >> that may be the problem. > The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this > with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third > party. If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A. -- John Varela Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email. |
|
|
#7 |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:20:25 -0400, John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net>
wrote: >On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote > > >If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles >with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A. I get 60 k miles from my front pad, I only use OEM. -- mred |
|
|
#8 |
|
|
"W. eWatson" <notvalid2@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without > getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and > finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a > foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600' > hill each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake > life is usually quite good at the start. Brakes have been a pain in the *** on my 01 Outback. I have followed a similar pattern as you have, but in IL with no freakin hills. The next ones will be OEM Subaru pads without a doubt. -- Todd H. 2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4 Chicago, Illinois USA |
|
|
#9 |
|
|
John Varela wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote > (in article <VITqk.18393$xZ.2230@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>): > >> johninky wrote: >>> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my >>> suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then >>> that may be the problem. >> The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this >> with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third >> party. > > If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles > with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A. > The thought has certainly occurred to me. -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/> |
|
|
#10 |
|
|
mred wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:20:25 -0400, John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote >> >> >> If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles >> with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A. > > I get 60 k miles from my front pad, I only use OEM. Do you drive up and down steep hills and have you consistently gotten 60K? -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/> |