> Cars > Subaru
Various Topics Home | Disclaimer | Report Adult Posts

Various Topics on Subaru



Subaru - "Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester" in Cars


Old 08-20-2008   #1
.. ..ats..
 
Default Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without getting
new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and finally another
22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a foothill area of Calif.,
and drive up and down at least one 5-600' hill each day. I talked to a
mechanic today and he said that brake life is usually quite good at the start.

--
Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)

(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet

Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
 
Old 08-20-2008   #2
.... ..a..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

W. eWatson wrote:
> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without
> getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and
> finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a
> foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600' hill
> each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake life is
> usually quite good at the start.
>

Hi,
With manual shift equipped car, brake can last longer.
 
Old 08-20-2008   #3
.. ..ats..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

Tony Hwang wrote:
> W. eWatson wrote:
>> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without
>> getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and
>> finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a
>> foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600'
>> hill each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake
>> life is usually quite good at the start.
>>

> Hi,
> With manual shift equipped car, brake can last longer.

I have an automatic. It's good to see there's someone here besides myself.
When I rejoined today, I saw only one other post. Months ago there were
hundreds.

--
Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)

(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet

Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
 
Old 08-20-2008   #4
..hnin..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my
suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then
that may be the problem.
 
Old 08-20-2008   #5
.. ..ats..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

johninky wrote:
> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my
> suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then
> that may be the problem.

The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this
with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third party.

--
Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)

(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet

Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
 
Old 08-21-2008   #6
.... ..re..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote
(in article <VITqk.18393$xZ.2230@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>):

> johninky wrote:
>> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my
>> suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then
>> that may be the problem.

> The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this
> with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third
> party.


If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles
with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A.

--
John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

 
Old 08-21-2008   #7
....
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:20:25 -0400, John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net>
wrote:

>On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote
>
>
>If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles
>with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A.


I get 60 k miles from my front pad, I only use OEM.
--

mred

 
Old 08-21-2008   #8
.... ..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

"W. eWatson" <notvalid2@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> I bought my Forester in Sept. 2002, and apparently drove 42K without
> getting new brakes. I then drove 22K before getting new breaks, and
> finally another 22K, when I now need new front brakes. I live in a
> foothill area of Calif., and drive up and down at least one 5-600'
> hill each day. I talked to a mechanic today and he said that brake
> life is usually quite good at the start.


Brakes have been a pain in the *** on my 01 Outback.

I have followed a similar pattern as you have, but in IL with no
freakin hills.

The next ones will be OEM Subaru pads without a doubt.

--
Todd H.
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
Chicago, Illinois USA
 
Old 08-21-2008   #9
.. ..ats..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

John Varela wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote
> (in article <VITqk.18393$xZ.2230@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>):
>
>> johninky wrote:
>>> If you had the original OEM pads replaced with OEM pads then ignore my
>>> suggestion. If the original pads were replaced with non OEM pads then
>>> that may be the problem.

>> The new brakes were not put on by Subaru; however, when I talked about this
>> with them, they made no claims about having superior brakes than a third
>> party.

>
> If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles
> with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A.
>

The thought has certainly occurred to me.

--
Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)

(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet

Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
 
Old 08-21-2008   #10
.. ..ats..
 
Default Re: Brake Mileage for 2003 Forester

mred wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:20:25 -0400, John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:02:03 -0400, W. eWatson wrote
>>
>>
>> If you got 42K miles with Brand A and have twice gotten only 22K miles
>> with Brand B, you might consider returning to Brand A.

>
> I get 60 k miles from my front pad, I only use OEM.

Do you drive up and down steep hills and have you consistently gotten 60K?

--
Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)

(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet

Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes





Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0