Various Topics on Toyota

..o.. .. ..ori..

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:34:46 GMT, Another Tom <sg7188@snet.net> wrote:

> This is why I am glad my
>vote counts as much as yours. (I'm sure that's annoying to you as well)
>
We don't count Democratic votes here in Florida. You guys are wrong
so we just discard all your chads...


Scott in Florida

..oth.. ..m

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:00:59 +0000, Scott in Florida wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:34:46 GMT, Another Tom <sg7188@snet.net> wrote:
>
>> This is why I am glad my
>>vote counts as much as yours. (I'm sure that's annoying to you as well)
>>
> We don't count Democratic votes here in Florida. You guys are wrong
> so we just discard all your chads...
>
>
> Scott in Florida

Apparenly someone did; looking at the vote totals I wouldn't exactly call
W's election "a mandate from the people"

..ar..

Steve wrote:
> In article <_ZEUb.10736$213.10110@edtnps89>,
> "Charks" <Charks@Charkstank.com> wrote:
>
>> Scott in Florida wrote:
>>> On 5 Feb 2004 17:44:55 -0800, beguna@mindspring.com (Arthur Begun)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I actually wasn't looking for this. I was looking to see whether
>>>> he had said the danger is imminent. In fact he said we would not
>>>> wait until it was imminent.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unlike the democrats that let people attack America (USS Cole etc
>>> etc) without doing their job.
>>>
>>> Because of the left (ie Demoncrats) being cowards and afraid to
>>> confront terrorists we ended up with 9/11.
>>>
>>> We now have a President that is not a weak kneed traitor and the War
>>> on Terror is being taken to the terrorists everywhere in the world.
>>>
>>> One of my boys is transporting Seals into areas you may never hear
>>> about. I would venture to say that there are a number of terrorists
>>> ***uming jungle temperature...
>>>
>>> ...Art....remember 9/11???
>>>
>>> We are at WAR, Art...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott in Florida
>>
>> Liberal saps fail to accept that fact and the terrorists play on
>> that sappy mentality.
>
> So that explains why terrorists attacked with George W. Bush in
> office. Guess they knew he'd invade Iraq if they did! Boy did they
> get theirs! They messed with the wrong party!! whoo hoo!!! Nice to
> know you right-wing brainiacs think Bush is a "liberal." I'd take a
> sappy mentality over a teenaged dumb*** mentality any day. Do your
> parents know you're online??
>
> Normal people miss Clinton's (for all his faults) spreading American
> values and prosperity around the globe--winning people's hearts and
> minds, instead of creating new generations of terrorists the way
> George W. Bush is.
>
> Steve

Sap! You are full of ****. Go back to school and finish your Grade 6.

..ar..

Patriot wrote:
> Beautifully put Steve.
>
> I also agree that the Bush supporters here sound like scared little
> children.
>
> Patriot

That would make YOU a terrified tiny infant.


>
>
> "Steve" <steve@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:steve-62E642.10482607022004@news.east.cox.net...
>> In article <bqXUb.14324$F23.13856@newsread2.news.pas.earthlin k.net>,
>> MDT Tech(R) <ssauer40@repairmen.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Another Tom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I guess "negotiating with terrorists" is the way Reagan
>>>> handled it. Can we say "arms for hostages"; That certainly is a
>>>> deterrant.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you are thinking of an entire different deal Tom, you must
>>> be pretty young?
>>>
>>> All Reagan did to get the hostages release was to be inagurated.
>>> They were petrified of what would happen and they knew "it would
>>> happen real soon" if htey werent released. Same thing just happened
>>> to Lybia.
>>
>> Er, prove it? It's one thing to make-believe little bravado fairy
>> tales in your head like a little child, it's another thing to expose
>> yourself as doing so in public (if you were of average intelligence
>> you'd be embarr***ed), and another still to vote or otherwise
>> support public policy based on fairy tales in your childish little
>> black-and-white-world mind. You probably didn't even make them up
>> yourself; they were probably fed to you by someone else. Why are
>> right wingers so enamoured with power and domination, that they need
>> to concoct these little dramas? Do they feel that weak? Are they
>> compensating for something they're lacking in?
>>
>> oh well,
>> Steve

..tri..

"Charks" <Charks@Charkstank.com> wrote in message
news:qNdVb.9693$Qa3.3879@edtnps89...
> Steve wrote:
> > In article <_ZEUb.10736$213.10110@edtnps89>,
> > "Charks" <Charks@Charkstank.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Scott in Florida wrote:
> >>> On 5 Feb 2004 17:44:55 -0800, beguna@mindspring.com (Arthur Begun)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I actually wasn't looking for this. I was looking to see whether
> >>>> he had said the danger is imminent. In fact he said we would not
> >>>> wait until it was imminent.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Unlike the democrats that let people attack America (USS Cole etc
> >>> etc) without doing their job.
> >>>
> >>> Because of the left (ie Demoncrats) being cowards and afraid to
> >>> confront terrorists we ended up with 9/11.
> >>>
> >>> We now have a President that is not a weak kneed traitor and the War
> >>> on Terror is being taken to the terrorists everywhere in the world.
> >>>
> >>> One of my boys is transporting Seals into areas you may never hear
> >>> about. I would venture to say that there are a number of terrorists
> >>> ***uming jungle temperature...
> >>>
> >>> ...Art....remember 9/11???
> >>>
> >>> We are at WAR, Art...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Scott in Florida
> >>
> >> Liberal saps fail to accept that fact and the terrorists play on
> >> that sappy mentality.
> >
> > So that explains why terrorists attacked with George W. Bush in
> > office. Guess they knew he'd invade Iraq if they did! Boy did they
> > get theirs! They messed with the wrong party!! whoo hoo!!! Nice to
> > know you right-wing brainiacs think Bush is a "liberal." I'd take a
> > sappy mentality over a teenaged dumb*** mentality any day. Do your
> > parents know you're online??
> >
> > Normal people miss Clinton's (for all his faults) spreading American
> > values and prosperity around the globe--winning people's hearts and
> > minds, instead of creating new generations of terrorists the way
> > George W. Bush is.
> >
> > Steve
>


> Sap! You are full of ****. Go back to school and finish your Grade 6.
>
>

The one constant here is that when you get them bushlovers going with common
sense points you get back a child's response.

Patriot

....

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:21:58 GMT, Another Tom <sg7188@snet.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 01:44:39 +0000, MDT Tech® wrote:
>
>> Another Tom wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I guess "negotiating with terrorists" is the way Reagan handled it.
>>> Can we say "arms for hostages"; That certainly is a deterrant.
>>
>>
>> I think you are thinking of an entire different deal Tom, you must be
>> pretty young?
>>
>> All Reagan did to get the hostages release was to be inagurated. They
>> were petrified of what would happen and they knew "it would happen real
>> soon" if htey werent released. Same thing just happened to Lybia.
>
>
>Apparently Lawrence Walsh wasted a lot of time in generating this report.
>It is a public record.
>
>http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/
>
You have to remember that all of the Regan ***-kissers get amnesia and
cannot remember that we gave the Iranian hostage-takers weapons.
Somehow I have to believe if he is the best president the Republicans
have to talk about, they are really in trouble. Regan broke the law
and never paid for it, his flunkies took the rap.

Posted by Rubber Dinosuarus

..T ..c..

Steve wrote: Why are right
> wingers so enamoured with power and domination, that they need to
> concoct these little dramas? Do they feel that weak? Are they
> compensating for something they're lacking in?
>
> oh well,
> Steve

Steve, get off welfare, the dependency upon democrats is killing you. I
suppose we could bomb an aspirin factory, kill its janotir to detract
from the Monical Lewinski ordeal and call it "war on terror". ;D Steve,
your foaming at the mouth. Arent you a member of the kind caring and
comp***ionate party? Arent you suppose to be inclusinve, able to accept
differering points of veiw? Your rabid response sais othewrwise.

..T ..c..

Steve wrote:
> Normal people miss Clinton's (for all his faults) spreading American
> values...

No, he was spreading seed instead.

..T ..c..

Another Tom wrote:
>
> Apparenly someone did; looking at the vote totals I wouldn't exactly call
> W's election "a mandate from the people"


A win is a win. Suck it up Tom.

..jorDo.. ..ilcity.c..

Subject: hypocrisy history

The way it looks, this is the guy that's going to be challenging
President Bush. Just when I thought the country was putting the
lying, cheating, corrupt years of the Defendant-In-Chief behind
us, another democrat comes along and, from all appearances, looks
like he can give William Jefferson Clinton a run for his money in
the hypocrisy department.

Can young guys even imagine if a republican would do some of this
stuff. Thanks once again to Brit Hume and the Grapevine. You'd
never hear this stuff if it were up to the other networks.

Bushy

Quinn's 1st Law: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite
of it's stated intent.

Now and Then

Howard Dean has criticized John Kerry for voting to authorize war
with Iraq last year, after voting against the first Gulf War in
1991.

There's more to it than that.

Kerry sent a letter to a constituent back in 1991, saying --
"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to
the early use of military force by the U.S. against Iraq. I share
your concerns. On January 11, I voted ... against a resolution
giving the president the immediate authority to go to war."

Nine days later, the same constituent received another letter
from Kerry, saying -- "Thank you for contacting me to express
your support for the actions of President Bush [in the Persian
Gulf]... From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and
unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the crisis."

The Leading Facts

Democratic frontrunner, John Kerry has said that he, "led the
fight" for deficit reduction in 1985. And more recently, "led the
fight" against President Bush's Medicare prescription drug bill.

But according to the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg
Public Policy Center, the measure to launch the balanced budget
was drafted by two Republicans and Kerry was not the first to
back it in 1985.

And The Washington Post said three months ago that it was Sen.
Ted Kennedy who, "led the fight" against President Bush's
prescription drug bill.

Hasn't Made Up His Mind

While Democrats are busy raising questions of President Bush's
military service, John Kerry -- who has made his Vietnam service
a centerpiece of his campaign -- says he hasn't made up his mind
whether to do the same.

But in 1992, Kerry went to the Senate floor to defend Bill
Clinton -- who was being accused of dodging the Vietnam draft.
Kerry called Clinton's critics -- "latter-day Spiro Agnews ...
[who were playing] to the worst instincts of divisiveness and
reaction," adding -- "the race for the White House should be
about leadership and leadership requires that one help heal the
wounds of Vietnam, not reopen them."

A Little Help from My ...

John Kerry -- who has cast himself as a lifelong fighter against
special interests -- helped an insurance company be able to
profit from investing federal dollars.

In 2000, he blocked legislation that would have stopped American
International Group -- or AIG -- from investing millions of
dollars it was overpaid in insurance for a major construction
project in Boston.

Kerry says he didn't do it for the company, he did it for his
constituents -- who needed the project finished. But the AP says
Kerry accepted $48,000 worth of donations to his senate and
presidential campaigns from AIG and its executives.