Toyota

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:42:05 -0500, "badgolferman"
<> wrote:

>> Idiot.
>>
>> Gee, it's REAL surprising that the "bad guys" dislike a president who
>> thinks he's the "tough guy" who is free to invade anyone he wants,
>> EVEN THOUGH the United Nations and world at-large agree it's a BAD
>> idea.
>>
>
>Who
>Would
>Osama
>Vote
>For
>?

Get it through your head, dimwit. There's other criteria for who
makes the best president besides "let's vote for whomever Osama
dislikes the most". If someone came along who was even more of a
war-monger than Bush, would he suddenly become the guy to lead our
country?

>Never forget 9/11/2001

What's 9/11 got to do with invading other countries? Unless you want
to make a case for invading Saudi Arabia, where most all the 9/11
attackers came from?

"Gee, we were lax-enough to let a bunch of assholes with box cutters
hijack some airliners. What should we do? I know, let's invade Iraq!
Duuuuuhhhhhh"

>Everything changed after that day. If you are not American and hate us,
>that is fine. If you are American and hate us, that's treason.

This isn't about hate. It's about doing what's best for America.

>An American President must have the well-being of his people first, not the
>political games played by UN and one-world advocates.

Then why isn't he doing something that actually makes us safer against
terrorism, instead of expending all our resources in Iraq?

>Whether John Kerry and his ilk are capable or willing to pursue those who
>attacked us is debatable. What is not debatable is the necessity to show
>the terrorists they picked on the wrong people.

The 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. What the HELL does our
invading Iraq got to do with deterring future acts of terrorism?

>To stop now would bring them back with more furor.

Nonsense. You're just an idiot pulling from your rear end.
Yeah, it's SO obvious that "the terrorists" won't mess with us now.
After all, there hasn't been any acts of terrorism in Iraq lately, has
there? The FACT is that we are causing MORE furor, MORE hatred of our
country.

Go after criminals, fine. Get OBL and people like him, fine. But
don't delude yourself into thinking that invading Iraq makes us ANY
safer from terrorist attacks.

>Once you've got your enemy down you don't let
>them back up.

We don't have our enemy down. You are delusional.

>That would be suicide.

Your opinions are worthless and wrong.

> Your opinions are worthless and wrong.

You would be taken much more seriously without all the demeaning
name-calling. Your conversational skills are akin to those who make
themselves feel good by bringing others down. It is easier to catch flies
with honey than with vinegar.

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:28:33 -0500, "Jonathan" <> wrote:

>Scott in Florida wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:05:48 -0500, "Jonathan" <> wrote:
>>
>>> Scott in Florida wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:51:34 -0800, "TomH" <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Shows how stupid you guys are. We will never use military action
>>>>> in N Korea. Doing so would be devastating to S.Korea. A
>>>>> crazy man who thinks he's a God with nukes and one of the
>>>>> largest armies in the world lined up on the S Korea border is
>>>>> looking for a reason to use them. Seoul would be leveled.
>>>>> Even Bush is smart enough to know that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You, obviously, don't have a clue about the US Military...
>>>>
>>>> North Korea would be about a month war...at best...
>>>>
>>> LOL Get real, we won't be fighting sand n.....................!!
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>
>> nope... the only way it would last a month is if we stopped for a week
>> or so to enjoy ourselves...
>>
>>
>> Scott in Florida
>Uh, ever heard of the Korean conflict, circa 1950 ~ 1953? :-D
>

Yup....

We have improved the military a million percent since then.

three weeks tops...for N Korea...


Scott in Florida

Jonathan wrote:

> Scott in Florida wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:05:48 -0500, "Jonathan" <> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:51:34 -0800, "TomH" <>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Shows how stupid you guys are. We will never use military action
>>>>>in N Korea. Doing so would be devastating to S.Korea. A
>>>>>crazy man who thinks he's a God with nukes and one of the
>>>>>largest armies in the world lined up on the S Korea border is
>>>>>looking for a reason to use them. Seoul would be leveled.
>>>>>Even Bush is smart enough to know that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You, obviously, don't have a clue about the US Military...
>>>>
>>>>North Korea would be about a month war...at best...
>>>>
>>>
>>> LOL Get real, we won't be fighting sand n.....................!!
>>>;o)
>>>
>>
>>nope... the only way it would last a month is if we stopped for a week
>>or so to enjoy ourselves...
>>
>>
>>Scott in Florida
>
> Uh, ever heard of the Korean conflict, circa 1950 ~ 1953? :-D
>
>
Ever hear of the 100 hopur war in Iraq? It "WAS" the 4th largest
military on the planet, WAS, now its the largest s metal yeard on
the planet.

--



"I am saddened that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign."
"We do not need to divide America over who served and how."
John Kerry, Feb 27, 1992


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."--Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp
for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with
weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

Tom wrote:
>
> There was only one terrorist in Iraq, now there are hundreds.

Tom, thats perfect! We wont have to run all over chasing them, they all
come right to us in the sand and "pop", a well placed round throught the
rag/skull and its done!




--



"I am saddened that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign."
"We do not need to divide America over who served and how."
John Kerry, Feb 27, 1992


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."--Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp
for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with
weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

dizzy wrote:


blah blah blah...

--



"I am saddened that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign."
"We do not need to divide America over who served and how."
John Kerry, Feb 27, 1992


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security."--Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp
for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with
weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

"Scott in Florida" <'t>

> We have improved the military a million percent since then.
>
> three weeks tops...for N Korea...
>
>
> Scott in Florida
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow, it's such a comfort to hear from the renowned military expert "Scott in
Florida". I'm just sure he'll lead us all to victory in North Korea. If
he can find it on a map.

Potential Bush talking points:

I never said he definitely had WMD.

I never said imminent.

Who said 2 million new jobs... not me.

I never had friends at Enron.

I never claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11..

Halliburton? What's Halliburton.

Lets all work together.

No nation building by the US.

Lawyer? Your guilty... you don't need a lawyer.

and so forth

In article <>,
" Mack Twamley" <> wrote:

> "Scott in Florida" <'t>
>
> > We have improved the military a million percent since then.
> >
> > three weeks tops...for N Korea...
> >
> >
> > Scott in Florida
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Wow, it's such a comfort to hear from the renowned military expert "Scott in
> Florida". I'm just sure he'll lead us all to victory in North Korea. If
> he can find it on a map.

I doubt she can.

Steve

In article <RyM2c.26854$ k.net>,
"Art" <> wrote:

> Potential Bush talking points:
>
> I never said he definitely had WMD.
>
> I never said imminent.
>
> Who said 2 million new jobs... not me.
>
> I never had friends at Enron.
>
> I never claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11..
>
> Halliburton? What's Halliburton.
>
> Lets all work together.
>
> No nation building by the US.
>
> Lawyer? Your guilty... you don't need a lawyer.
>
> and so forth

Just the tip of the iceberg.

Bush can't even get an economy going on a credit card. That's pretty
damned sad. But not surprising for such an intellectual dynamo.

Steve